Poland: internet cout against soldier

adminonDecember 8, 2021January 28, 2022Leave a Comment

Jacek Zebryk is a Polish Iraq and Afghanistan veteran, but he still leads to war

For his personal campaign, the soldier sits at home on the sofa, on the coffee table with the hook blanket of the unfolded laptop. So he collides polish internet forums, in the sight he has wanning against Polish soldiers in use.

"The next occupant does not live anymore. Applause for the Afghan freedom cheaters", wrote the 28-year piotr G. In response to the death of a Polish soldier in the Afghan province of Ghazni.

Piotr g. Defielen himself in court, as a Pacifist he kinken so then. But he was sentenced to a month of social work for a month. Already 137 such sentences has the continued active field spirit, 56 of which the prosecutor has passed to the police.

"The internaes (so the users of the network are called in Poland) should realize that it is punishable to praise crimes and to tighter others", Discovered the field spirits against the Gazeta Wyborcza. In negotiations he wants to continue to see the Schmarke in the eyes.

But the research and the appearances in court are expensive and above all costly. The soldier is financially supported by the State Rusting Group Bumar, who is currently hoping for a four billion euros of heavy tank production contract.

The Group, which is divided into forty subcontractors, dominates the Polish rusts market. His spokesman does not discharge the financing Zebryks at all.

Critics, such as the philosophy professor Roman Kubicki from Pozen, flared that such an open discussion can not be conducted on the meaning of the Polish ISAF application, especially since a rusting company is particularly interested in the further authorization of the war.

In Poland, the Afghanistan use was always controversial, but the complete jerse train of the troops is already set at 2014. A debate for the meaning or nonsense of the ISAF mission of the NATO member does not take place in Poland’s Office.

But about Zebryk it will not be calm so fast. His campaign has now called radical opponents on the plan that threaten him anonymously. He and his family now receive police protection.

Silence and skepticism welcomed ICANNS "procedure" For new top Level domains

After years of fierce fucking around the system of domain names, it was expected that the acquisition of new top level domains (TLDS) was called worldwide as the return of Jesus Christ. That’s not like this: on the 16. November came exactly this notice from Icann, but even under appendages of the politics of the names and numbers, there were little reaction to occasional, rather evaporated belief.

The reports that go out for awkward explanations were amazingly negative. BBC online, for example, opened its editorial in sprinkled tone:

"The new domain names in the network will probably contribute little to an opening of the Internet and an extension of the possible name selection."

An article in the Australian ARN.Net quoted an analyst of the Gartner Group:

"That was not introduced to make life easier for an average company, absolutely not… I think it makes us life heavier."

Remotely, it is difficult to judge how equal to the envision was really absorbed. Some details (for example, that over the new TLDs is still negotiated, and they are only provisional) stinging in the eye, but are far too topfindig: Exact sense of procedures has always been in the coverage of ICANN has always been a strong (For example, see this long tirade published in the otherwise careful New Republic). Other smaller details (for example, that the TLDs will be available in a few months) seem to be credible, but nonetheless inadaquat.

Even the main theme with which the BBC article was initiated, namely the browsingness of the new TLDs to the irrelevancy, does not convince completely. Obviously, the domains of some hundred airlines are .Aero or some thousand museums under .Museum on the domain market do not even appear as a statistically significant value. Much less clearly is how the media sources, which are based on their mains-specific stories, seemed to develop a track nose that the ICANNS work to the coarse part are infected by Icann’s work.

The explanation is probably elsewhere to look elsewhere: Im are sufficient Kustenort Marina del Rey, California, where on 16. November a phalanx of journalists witness the "historical" Spectacles, like the board of Icann, was ineptly divesting on a whole series of co-affections until the result of an extension of the namespace, as is the look like. In any case, the board had no precise idea of what (at least theoretically) exactly the ideal state of a "non-hierarchical", "On consensus-based" Organization meets.

However, one had – and that was unforgivable – also no coordinated plan or procedure to determine the winners; And so the discussions of disorienting cheers fluctuated between sleeping, uneasanted remarks, contalent patios and insignificant preferences. This main impression is hired how the Dot-Comer say, At the end of the day (ultimately) for many cautious observers of the meeting, including the journalists. There was really not much much that one could write; And with the sympathy rest, one risked to get excited about triumphal wradies in the mysteries of the internal machinations of Icann (banned by most editors).

Fortunately, some journalists described the procedure as stated as farce. Brock Meeks from MCNBC, who was present, mocked the procedure "At best moody" and compared the procedure with a Seance in which the spirit of Walt Disney is called.

NTKNOW, which was from a safe distance via webcast, fogged:

".Surname"? I’m sorry, but you did not get exactly such top-level domain onset when you snatch a seven-year-old on the strain and commands him either a suggestion or you miss a blue eye? Strangely, ICANN seemed to have closed this approach to the final meeting on Saturday in LA just this procedure…. (The truth… was so likes and bizarre as you could just want to wish…

Unchecked, however, the silence of the media in terms of ICANNS defective procedures probably drove to restore their reputation in the backlog and thereby the position of the organization still strong. This is worrying if ICANNS already departed from ICANNS to surprise its actions, whether on behalf of the technical coordination granted by the US Department of Commerce, or only on its own statutes.

For example, take the fact that ICANNS’s own statutes (V.1.iii.3b) require that every mockage, the "significantly influenced the operation of the Internet or third parties" – such as the recognition of new TLDs – "a majority among the members of the Executive Board requires." Only twists the nineteen board members of ICANN were involved in the decision on the new TLDs directly. Three (Eugenio Triana, Geraldine Capdebosq and George Conrades) just did not appear. And another four (Robert Blokzijl, Amadeu Abril I Abril, Philip Davidson and Greg Crew) had included themselves in the matter – although Blokzijl and Abril negotiate nonetheless in the previous discussions. So how could ICann the motion of Afilias on one ".info" with only eight Tune? Now, by taking an ad hoc explanation to the procedure that the vote is not the "match" Opinion of the Executive Board Representing Animals, but rather one "Apparent" the present is.

Considering that one needed three voting rounds to come to a result, even these eight rich yes-AHS were already a performance. The reason for this repetition is almost surreal: The board was not sure what you tuned overwhelm.

From pragmatic reasons ICANN requested all applicants to indicate alternative TLD strings in their contributions, which also happened; and from other (but not less pragmatic), the Executive Board used a short description, namely a single TLD, to refer to any application – the first string in alphabetical order. The of Afilias preferred TLD was ".web", ".info" and ".site" were only caught as alternatives; But during a coarse part of the discussions, the board debated over ".info". Anyway, according to the damp tuning, which was decided which onset was accepted, the Boardsquatter Hans Kraaijenbrink requested that the Executive Board should specify the assignment of the TLD to a registry instead of releasing this decision to the ICANN personnel to negotiate.

His application resulted in a confused discussion in which ".web" several times ".info" was replaced because some of the board members thought it was heading. Another application (the on ".iii"/".by" From Sarnoff / Neuvel, who had always emerged the day before the day before, was brought to the case by the free association process of the ICANN employee and Auberberaterers Joe Sims, based on the question of the string: ".iii" Goods (according to Mike Roberts, the ICANN CEO) "unspeakable"; ".by" could come into conflict with the land code for Peru (an ISO code of three letters but not used); And according to Sims, the application differently differed from what had been presented (an assessment that had been reflected in the previous day during the advice); and also (again sims) it would be unwise

Interview with the cultural scientist Nico Stehr to religious elements in the climate debate

Nico Stehr is a professor at Zeppelin University in Friedrichshafen on Lake Constance. Together with the meteorologist Hans von Storch he wrote the essay "Insights into the feasible", in which he shows blind stains in the climate bank.

In your article "Insights into the feasible" you describe if I understood you correctly, the possibility, individually by waiving luxury and convenience to rescue the climate "contribute" as a quasi-religious act, which allows the "climate-essiste" individual, through the loveable CO2 asceticism, to demonstrate its own moral high quality against the other, ie the environmental witness, and have been added.
Professor Stehr: The public appeals of climate researchers, politicians and environmental organizations in Germany and other countries are all aiming for only one climate change: Under Climate Protection is the limitation of the outboat of greenhouse gases. As a result, it does not surprise that individual or small groups, impressed by these appeals, in fact stranded to reduce their CO2 imprint and ‘virtuous’ to behave – for example by living in a low-energy house or cycling with the bike contribute to climate protection. I am the conviction that climate protection can not be understood as one-sided. It is less about the protection of the climate before society, but I believe that one must also become increasingly serious thoughts on climate protection within the meaning of the provision, ie the protection of society before the climate change,. Also the goods of virtuous behavior. You write that Al Gore "tabooed" climate change provision and instead waiver sermon. This is reminiscent of setting the pope to sexuality and AIDS. There are structural similarities here?
Professor Stehr: No, not necessarily. But Al Gore has not only occurred in recently that one should emphasize the reaction of society to climate change, especially the reduction of greenhouse gases. In contrast, precaution or even worse will be a term that is particularly tabuised – as a kind of ‘challenge’ of nature understood, which is why one should concentrate as much as possible on the problem of reducing greenhouse gases. That’s at least his position. This attitude has never changed Gore in the last two decades and also emphasized in the youngest time after being more intensively facing the topic of global climate change, again. The public debate is not presented as an alternative to CO2 avoidance, but almost exclusively so-called "Climate kept" How do you explain that such persons are prefixed as counterpart to the CO2 avoiders to words?
Professor Stehr: The public discussion with the so-called climate controlers, which question the anthropogenic climate change in terms of principle or do not accept the causes of climate change referred to by climate research, is partly due to the climate assistants themselves. In the public there is now a consensus that is more comprehensive than that within climate research. Namely, that we have to do it with changes in the natural climate, for which the behavior of people is responsible. The medial conflicts with the skeptics are partly co-determined by the climate assists, such as Stefan Rahmstorf, or even caused. In my opinion, it is not worth it, in view of the extensive surveying in the public political space, the consensus of climate research and what is really necessary to social and politically necessary in the coming years, with the skeptics. In view of the wearing nature, one should become increasingly thought about paths and measures that have the handling of these changes in mind: So climate protection as a protection of society before changing. Especially as such precautionary and adding measures immediately grab and not, as the reduction of greenhouse gases (if they should be successful), will be noticeable in decades or end of this century. What do you consider from funds for risk bonding the loads of climate change?
Professor Stehr: The successful precautionary and adding measures cost natural. For this resources, and the consequences of climate change will be serious in societies, which can not necessarily affect these measures. Accordingly, it will be necessary that the developed companies, which are now responsible for the majority of greenhouse gases, is to deal with such regions in Africa or Asia, which are unable to adapt to changes from their own power. If it is about, then such funds are politically and morally necessary. The danger of climate-reduced weather events such as heavy rain, excessive floods and heat periods, is already very rough in many regions of this world. Just think of New Orleans. The vulnerability of our livelihoods is increasing in the mabe in which the growing world-evolution of worlds settles in regions, which are danger, in the growing population groups are neginegalized and victims of the political economy so-called Natural disasters become.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply